Access to health care is a fundamental human right recognised by governments around the world. Fulfilment of that right must include access to good quality, affordable medicines. Yet one in every three people in the world does not have the basic medicines they need.

Availability can be restricted by a variety of factors, ranging from cost of medicines to transport problems and from fraud and inefficiency in the supply chain (for example in 2008 the Uganda Minister of Health told reporters that half the medicines bought by the government for the public health system were being siphoned off)  to doctors’ lack of knowledge about specific drugs. Weak health systems, a common deficiency in developing countries, can mean that staff and infrastructure to prescribe, dispense and deliver medicines are not available.

A vivid example of what availability means in practice is the treatment of AIDS. The development of a class of drugs known as anti-retrovirals (ARVs) promised to turn AIDS from a certain killer to a potentially manageable chronic illness. Partly because of their cost, they were available to some HIV-positive people in industrialised countries but to only a lucky few in the developing world. A concerted international effort is changing the situation. Data from Botswana suggest that in the year after anti-retroviral treatment was made widely available in the country, adult deaths fell eight per cent. UNAIDS/WHO reported that scaling up antiretroviral treatment in low- and middle-income countries in the four years to 2006 saved about two million life-years.

Inequity in securing access to drugs is matched by an imbalance in the way international pharmaceutical companies undertake research. Over 90 per cent of medicines research and development focuses on the medical conditions of the richest 20 per cent of the world’s population. New medicine is needed for diseases that disproportionately affect the poor, especially neglected diseases.

Increased transparency and accountability can ease all these problems and bottlenecks. MeTA’s approach is to organise multi-stakeholder groups – committees of people representing all organisations with an interest in health provision – and for participants to then harness the power of information to tackle the problems.

MeTA believes its work can add real value to the work that participating countries and their international partners are already doing to increase access to medicines and improve health.

News Stories

Displaying results 1 to 10 out of 161

01/02/2012

At the moment we are working on updating the MeTa website. Thank you for your patience.

04/03/2011

This note provides advice and guidance to existing and prospective MeTA pilot countries – and specifically their national Secretariats and multi-stakeholder groups or Councils – as they take steps towards establishing the practice of routine disclosure of key medicines data.

25/11/2010

The MeTA Toolbox is live

01/09/2010

Latest news, reviews and events

12/07/2010

An independent evaluation of the pilot phase was carried out between December 2009 and February 2010. This is the Summary Report.

08/07/2010

Latest news, reviews and events

31/03/2010

Latest news, reviews and events

22/02/2010

Access to essential medicines gets an airing in Zambia

22/02/2010

A tool to measure the level of transparency and vulnerability to corruption in selected areas of the public pharmaceutical sector, developed under the GGM programme

19/02/2010

First findings from a study by WHO and the Drug Quality and Information Program on the quality of key antimalarial medicines in Sub-Saharan African countries

Displaying results 1 to 10 out of 161